Large Language Models are a powerful tool to gain an initial view on the strength of complex claims made by a little known scholar. 

Professionally tuned AI models are extremely reluctant to back an outsider view against an entrenched and established scientific community consensus, and that makes it remarkable that AI models will often wax lyrical about my research. 

I say 'often' because on some occasions it will respond negatively, although when such responses are inspected it usually turns out that the model has not taken into account all of my papers, and all of the key points I make in them. Irrespective of such variation, it always concludes that the theory is coherent, has strong explanatory power, warrants interest and needs peer review. 

Compared to the ChatGPT example Perplexity performed even more extensive research into my claims, papers and results than ChatGPT did, and I allowed it to give a longer response (500 words).